« maggie my hero |
Main
| before... »
november 5, 2002
increasing difficulty
Found a little bit of time yesterday to work on the Dale sweater. I'm about half way done with the second sleeve now. I'm really looking forward to starting the body, not only because it will be a lot more fair-isle work than the sleeves, but also because I won't have to do it on double pointed needles (grrr!) and I won't have to do a lot of increases (boooh!).
I am very happy with how the sleeves are coming out overall, but one thing that is bothering me are the increases. They just look bad in some places, especially where I was doing the pattern. I'm still learning all the knitting secrets like when to use which increases (for some reason the decreases seem more intuitive to me), so I thought I could try out some different methods on this sweater. I usually use a knit-into-the-stitch-below increase, which someone at Knitsmiths showed me and called an invisible increase. This method always looked good in regular stockinette before, but this time some of the "invisible" increases were coming out visible, even unsightly! Well, over the weekend I received my back issues of Interweave Knits and one of them had a very helpful article by Ann Budd on increases. So I switched to what she called a raised increase -- and what I've elsewhere seen as just make one -- that is, picking up the bar between the stitches and knitting it twisted. I had hoped this would really neaten up the increases, but the new increases kinda looked the same just a bit more bumpy. So I went back to my original method. Elizabeth Zimmerman suggests doing the same increase I was originally doing, but twisting the stitch picked up from the row before. I tried that too once or twice and it seemed to pull the color from the previous row up too much for my liking. Hrrmpf.
So, I think I've messed with the increase line enough on this sleeve! Maybe on the next set of sleeves (got two sweaters to knit, you know!) I'll try EZ's loop method from Knitting without Tears.
Do you all have a preferred method for increasing?
posted by alison at 9:12 am | in
bugs!
,
techniques
For my increases, I like to knit into the stitch the correct way, and then knit into the back of the same stitch before taking it off the needle.
I almost always use the knit one from the row below increase. I think all increases show to some extent but this one generally shows less. Sometimes I use the M1, picking up the bar between stitches and knitting into the back of it. That one seems to work best when I'm doing something lacy as no matter what there's always a small hole where the increase is made.
I also like Larry's invisible increase...it's the one I always use for shaping sleeves, especially when doing colorwork. I've discovered (the hard way, hehe) that the horizontal bar increase (knitting or purling into the same stitch twice) tends to lift from the row below. So, if you're making an increase in a row that has been knit in a different colored yarn than the previous row, the previous row's color is going to be lifted up into the current row. Does that make sense?
This might be a bit late, but have you considered knitting a sleeve from the top down? That way, you don't have to increase, but decrease, which blends in much nicer, in my opinion.
I do EZ's "make 1" from Knitting Without Tears.
I just remember the first time I did it, I thought "Duh!" It was so simple and looks very good.
I'm interested in reading what you settle on.
Mary
thanks to your link, I now have a name to go with the way I increase on my mittens. I use the EZ loop for mittens, but for sweaters I do the same as Julie. I think you just need to stay consistent with the method you started with or else it will mess up the overall design.
Thanks for all your tips, everyone. So far I'm sticking with the original increases I was using, the invisible knit-into-stitch below one. I think next time I will try the top-down method like you suggested, Becky. I don't see why it wouldn't work and decreases would look much better. Great idea!
all content, design, and images © 2002-11 alison hansel
|