[return to the blue blog]
 

------------

the knitsmithy

the blue blog

- archives

works in progress

finished projects

free patterns

------------

contact:
alison [at] knitsmiths
[dot] us



« socks? dpns? help! | Main | a joe sweater »


december 3, 2002

a little advice can be a bad thing

Get ready. Here's my rant about the KnitNet article, warning you all not to take knitting advice from amateur enthusiasts but rather only from those whose "financial well-being are linked to the quality of information." Okay, I'm not making any money from this site, so clearly everything I have to say about knitting (or otherwise) should be taken to be unreliable crap.

One might ask if this is perhaps the motivation behind KnitNet starting to charge for subscriptions - to gain credibility? Alright, that's unfair. I know that many people have used their video knitting primers to learn to knit and patterns to make wonderful items. Even when their articles and advice were - gasp! - both free and on the internet (beware, the alleged signs of untrustworthy advice)! Hmmmm.... How did all those people manage to discern good knitting advice, of the sort offered by KnitNet, from the other free advice lurking out on the net, of the sort KnitNet wants to protect us from? Well, Regis, I'm gonna have to go with B. We're not total idiots, thank you, and are inundated nowadays with so much information that we are already always judging each piece of advice (including yours).

So you're a contestant on Survivor and one person comes up to you and says, "Dude." (they talk like that, you know) "Dude, don't trust any of these other people, they're all lying all the time. Let me tell you what's going down. I'll give it to you straight." What do you do? Well, "whose livelihood depends on getting it right"? "Dude. I toootally need the money. It's not just a game for me." I can trust him now, right? What I really take issue with is this rule they give us for determining whom to trust. There are loads of people who despite (and indeed because of) financial considerations, lie to and manipulate us. And it's very hard to trust someone with motives ($1,000,000 or advertising revenue, perhaps) when they tell me not to trust anyone but them. And on a personal note, I really don't like it when I sense that someone is insulting me (either by calling me stupid or impugning my character).

It's not that I'm against this sort of an article in general. Of course people should be aware that search engines are coughing up every-damn-thing that uses the terms requested and any nut/genius could have written what they find. But we're talking about KNITTING here. (I'm gonna go out on a limb and just trust most of you guys and gals, 'cause I see no reason why you would be offering insane or dangerous KNITTING advice.) I wanna see this type of warning given to - no, forced onto - students, parents, voters, citizens. And regarding things that are truly important and truly difficult to judge well, like politics and life. Not 'the knit stitch'.

P.S - Thanks to Jamie for pointing out the article in her blog and giving me a reason to rant and then go calm myself down with a little knitting.
P.P.S. - Knitty rules!

posted by alison at 7:40 am | in just blogging
Comments

Thank you, Alison. Very well said! :-)

Posted by: Wendy at December 3, 2002 7:59 AM

Amen, Alison. It's scarey when someone thinks they need to be the "middleman" for info dissimanated onine.

Posted by: Laura at December 3, 2002 8:08 AM

But, but, but...I put my short row heel info out on my blog for free! Does that mean I'm untrustworthy? Does that mean I don't know what I'm talking about? Hmmm...Maybe I should charge you a nickle! ;)

I think they're just trying to justify becoming a "pay" magazine.

Posted by: Kim at December 3, 2002 10:08 AM

What about the designers/publishers "whose livelihood depends on getting it right" who've sold us overpriced books RIDDLED with errors?? Like "A Gathering of Lace" published by the Knitters folks for a start. So we're to mistrust what we find for free and pay mucho $$$ for patterns that are incorrect?
Right.

Posted by: Kathy at December 3, 2002 10:14 AM

*clap! clap!*

Posted by: Theresa at December 3, 2002 10:56 AM

I emailed the editor about this article, and received an extremely smug reply. My own personal rant November archive) took off into the realm of recognising issues of control - it makes me verrry angry.

Posted by: anne at December 3, 2002 11:44 AM

Alison - well said.

And here's an interesting piece of news - this article has changed since I first ran across it. The writer had originally used terms like "bozo" and "fool" to describe those who "dole out advice" for free ("Any fool can put up a web site..."). What you're reading now is a very PC version of what was originally written.

Here's the link: http://www.knitnet.com/free/page9.htm

Posted by: Jamie at December 3, 2002 12:30 PM

Thanks Jamie. I hadn't noticed that my link was broken. And about the previous version: o-my-god.

For all who want to read more ranting, here's the link to Anne's rant. Or if you want a calmer reaction, check out Fillyjonk (last entry on page).

Posted by: alison at December 3, 2002 1:28 PM

Amen sister. Seems like it's a lame justification for charging for their publication.

Posted by: Melissa at December 3, 2002 3:02 PM

Very well written, Alison. I agree whole-heartedly. And I, personally, was insulted by this KnitNet writer's (and I use the term writer very, very loosely) short-sighted article of no consequence. I didn't learn anything from it. Most of the links they provide to other, ahem, "resources" are links to products in THEIR STORE. Further, the fact that they feel themselves even capable of pointing out credible resources is downright cheeky. I rarely visited KnitNet because, quite frankly, I found most of the patterns to be very, very ordinary. Like I wrote on my blog, anybody can put up a subscription-only online knitting magazine and try to pass it off as haute-couture. Doesn't make it so, though.

Posted by: Becky at December 4, 2002 1:26 AM

well said. my sentiment definitely was the same as "We're not toal idiots, thank you." We know how to judge for ourselves whether something is worth our time

http://www.blueschnauzer.org/archives/000488.html#000488

Posted by: blue at December 4, 2002 8:11 PM




all content, design, and images © 2002-11 alison hansel